最熱門的 Pokémon 歌曲

作為現時最火爆的手遊 Pokemon Go，除了玩遊戲之外當然還要聽一兩首關於 Pokemon 的歌曲配合一下氣氛吧！雖然 Pokemon GO 至今還沒有在香港 / 台灣地區上架，那我們只好聽聽 Pokemon 的音樂繼續等待吧！音樂串流 Spotify 精選了 5 首最受歡迎的歌曲，一起來感受下 Pokemon GO 熱潮！

No.1 Pokemon Theme

No.2 Pokerap

No.3 Pokemon Johto

No.4 Go Pokemon Go

No.5 I Want To Be A Hero

Pokemon Go 試玩了24小時之後， 我決定刪除寶可夢這個遊戲。

除了遊戲本身問題多多，根本不像個游戲，我覺得：

一、無法克制想升級的慾望和炫耀

我本身就是電玩愛好者，所以這種簡單（無聊) 又富成就（炫耀）感的遊戲設定真的會讓我不斷的想出門啊。可是步行出門治安不可靠，駕車又不能玩～～～


二、都市的道路環境不太適合

雖然遊戲標榜「公園與旅遊景點比較多神奇寶貝」，但明明很多驛站和道場都在大馬路邊或人口密集處！尤其是都標在神殿前，什么東東啊？

越投入這遊戲，就越容易讓自己暴露在危險之中（除了會不專心走路外，還會遇上很多瘋狂的汽機車駕駛...）


三、雖然更願意帶孩子散步，但我卻有太多機會把視線從她身上移開

因為在抓寶時，我會極度投入的在丟球，而完全忽略小孩身邊的狀況以及她的行為。雖然每次時間並不長（看我的技術），但我認為還是有一些安全疑慮。像我已經收服了83隻，那就代表我至少呆站在路邊83次...

「我覺得這遊戲真不適合我。」
「怎麼會？我覺得超好玩的耶！」
「可是我就沒什麼感覺啊！」...
「到底在幹嘛？一群瘋子神經病！」


不過，雖然拒絕體驗就立即對這世界火紅運動判刑的人，在某種程度上是有點太過理性，但為了玩遊戲而造成公共危害的人卻是更不可取啊！

所以我還是想呼籲所有寶可夢的玩家：

騎車不集球，開車不孵蛋，
抓寶不擋道，秩序沒煩惱。

edit source: https://www.facebook.com/yousheng0609/photos/a.115399125186829.14140.114874888572586/1161997037193694

Pokemon Go 寶可夢給不懂的人看

玩盡時差！ Pokémon GO 製作「無限」香爐大法！

Pokémon GO 內有道具 Incense 和 Lucky Egg，可以在 30 分鐘之內吸引更多小精靈以及賺取更多經驗值，這些道具是收費的，贈送的十分有限，玩家可能在此用了不少金錢。然而，有網民發現了相信是一個漏洞的祕技，玩家可以由此製作「無限」 Incense 或「無限」 Lucky Egg。
「無限」香爐製作步驟

1. 使用 Incense 或 Lucky Egg 道具，你會看到時間是 30 分鐘以下。

2. 確定道具效果生效之後，離開 Pokémon GO 應用程式，打開設定 App，按「一般」→「日期和時間」。

3. 關閉「自動設定時間」，讓時間調整介面顯示出來。

4. 設定時間，把時間撥回過去，但時差不可超過 30 分鐘。

5. 回到 Pokémon GO，你有沒有發現道具的剩餘使用時間長了！？

時間就是關鍵

問題時間來了，延長了時間始終會完結，如何製作「無限」 Incense 或「無限」 Lucky Egg？請確保道具仍然生效，當你每次發現生效時間差不多完結，例如只欠 5 分鐘，可重覆第 2-4 步，把時間撥回過去，但時差不超過 30 分鐘，你就可以用到「無限」 Incense 或「無限」 Lucky Egg 道具了。

使用這祕技，有 3 點要留意。第 1，道具使用了就是使用了，這祕技只是盡可能延長時間，並不會因為這個祕技是獲得更多道具。第 2，如果你希望主動停止使用並等待道具效果完結，才能夠撥回時間，否則道具效果會因為時間到了自動結束。第 3，同樣有 30 分鐘限制的 Lure Module 不能適用，原因是這道具是針對 Pokéstop 使用，對所有途徑的玩家均生效。

註：由於涉及改動時間，手機時間會與伺服器不一致，使用上述祕技可能會導致鎖帳或要求用戶同步時間的風險，請謹慎使用。

教你如何讀懂 Pokémon GO 地圖介面！

Pokémon GO 登陸香港已有數日，雖然試玩、祕技分享很多，但是不少人至今仍然摸著石頭過河，甚至有人問小編，那顆藍點是什麼，為何有花瓣出現？如何更容易找到小精靈的位置？

地圖位置準不準？於是，小編就透過兩張螢幕截圖，教你如何讀懂 Pokémon GO 的主介面。

1. 背景圖片：基於 Pokémon GO 遊戲是以定位尋找小精靈，加上開發者有 Google 背景，主介面背景地圖是建基於 Google 地圖製作，但地圖也有一些修改，例如一些行人路會以「較窄的道路顯示」。左上角有時候會有反白的精靈球圖示，這是應用程式正在讀取網絡。
   
2. 彈出的草：代表有該處附近有精靈，如有小精靈出現，會以它的形態現身，按下去就可以捉
   
3. 藍色的大頭針：Pokéstop，如接近到某個範圍會變大，按入去可以取精靈球、精靈蛋或更多道具。取完 Pokéstop 的道具的會變成粉紫色（圖左下方有一個），要隔一段時間才能再取得。
   
4. 有粉紅花瓣飄逸的藍色的大頭針：代表有人在 Pokéstop 使用 Lure Module 撒花，吸引小精靈到該處旁邊。
   
5. 特別高而且有雲台的大頭針：道館，會以佔領道館的紅、黃、藍隊以及防衛的小精靈作為識別，訓練員等級達 LV5 就可以行過去切搓和挑戰。
   
6. 右下角白條：顯示附近可能有的小精靈，你可以選擇小精靈，以腳步顯示精靈與你的距離，三隻腳顯示距離是 1km 以下，2 隻腳是 10m 以下，1 隻腳是 1m 以下，沒有腳的話就很快遇到。
   
7. 下方中間精靈球，Pokémon GO 精靈球選單，可育成和回復寵物和精靈蛋、查看圖鑑、內購、道具。
   
8. 左下方的「你」：查閱玩家的等級、紀錄、儲存的 Pokécoin、加入的隊伍、以及各種徽章。
   
9. 右上角的指南針：在地圖中辨別方向用的。
   
10. 你在此（以 GPS 偵測）

上海迪士尼...小童隨處便溺、遊人企圖「偷電」

上海迪士尼開幕一個月，除了設施富有中國特色外，樂園中遊人的行為亦盡顯中國特色。有來自新加坡的迪士尼愛好者，拍下一幕幕遊人的舉動，包括孩子在路邊便溺、裝置被破壞、看表演時撐傘等。他在影片中多次提及「中國，這是中國」，似是對中國人的不文明表現顯得無奈。該片段已有近25萬人次觀看。

迪士尼愛好者、新加坡人Dwayne Tan上傳影片，以「上海迪士尼擠擁的文化」為題，記錄他在七月遊上海迪士尼時的見聞。在排隊玩機動遊戲時，排後方的人與他的朋友距離只有約1-2厘米，緊貼相隨，Dwayne直言完全沒有個人的空間，人貼人的情況令他汗顏。而旁邊的一些空隙，例如分隔隊伍的半身牆表面，竟然滿佈垃圾，更有民眾走進隊伍之間的非公眾地方，小朋友在放肆地玩耍追逐，使那地方有如「營地」。

片段中其中一個場景，是一名男孩在母親的陪伴下於路邊撒尿，Dwayne提醒大家要有心理準備，又補充他看到一名女孩沒有穿褲子，在園中到處跑，但他認為不宜拍攝。在看戶外表演時，站在前方的一些觀眾撐起雨傘，阻礙了後排觀眾的視線，他質疑「沒有下雨亦沒有很熱，為什麼人們要撐起傘?」

走在上海迪士尼的路上，Dwayne不時會發現令他摸不著頭腦的東西，例如一位男士研究樂園路邊的裝置，嘗試從中「偷電」為電話充電；一群身穿校服的女生對工作人員拉拉扯扯，只為了獲取更多貼紙；全園禁止自拍棍，但仍有女遊人用以自拍。

上海迪士尼的城堡是全球最大、最高，內部可供遊人參觀，從影片中看到，城堡內部成為遊人休憩乘涼的地方，大批民眾直接坐在牆邊、支柱邊的地上休息，更有人在內吸煙。

而有設施內牆上的一些小裝置，則有被破壞的痕跡，Dwayne又稱目賭人們看到緊急出口門時，會拉開進內探究的舉動。

影片引起不少網友留言，表達對中國人的行為不滿，有指中國人有上海迪士尼後便不需要再破壞其他國家的樂園，亦有指不忍心這麼好的樂園坐落於如此糟糕的地方。

4 Really WEIRD Things about the “Terrorist” Bomb Attack in Puchong

A couple of weeks ago, a grenade exploded at a Movida nightclub in Puchong while they were watching one of the EURO matches in the wee hours of the morning. Luckily the grenade didn’t kill anyone, but it did end up injuring 8 people.

Victims of the bomb blast. Image from Asiaone.

And if that wasn’t terrible enough, nearly a week later, our IGP Khalid Abu Bakar confirmed that the grenade attack was the FIRST successful attack by ISIS on Malaysia!

“As we have said, we investigate from all aspects, as a result of our investigation, we found that it’s true, there is an IS element involved in the incident at Movida cafe. – IGP Khalid Abu Bakar, as quoted by The Malay Mail Online

And in light of all the ISIS attacks that have been happening worldwide, it really wouldn’t seem that surprising that this attack was, in fact, an ISIS attack. (They have been threatening to attack us for a while now.) But what if it wasn’t?

As we were reading up on the story, there seemed to be a few very weird things about this whole situation. To be precise, 4 things that made us rethink whether it really was a terrorist attack or not.



1. The Selangor state deputy police chief said it wasn’t a terrorist attack

“I rule out terror attack. The blast is likely motivated by business rivalry among the local gangsters or a revenge attack.” – Abdul Rahim Jaafar, Selangor deputy police chief, as quoted by South China Morning Post

Mr Abdul Rahim Jaafar said this right after the grenade attack. But besides him, when the news of the grenade attack broke out on the Lowyat forum, quite a number of people attributed the attack to gangs as well.

*Waiting for police statement before we speculate anything. High chances of gangster thingy. I have personally seen gangster went into business establishments years ago asking for protection money.*

And it seems that they may have been on to something because we did find reports of gang violence like hereand here. In fact, right after the blast, the owner of Movida actually blamed it on an Indian couple (which led to the Indian couple threatening to sue).

“An eyewitness saw two Indian men (throw) an explosive at the said couple.

This is an isolated case and (does) not in any way indicate an attack (based on) any religion, belief or race.” – Director of Movida bar, Roger Hew, as quoted by Channel News Asia

So his first thought was to blame it on something local. And speaking of local…



2. Why would ISIS wanna target Puchong anyway?

In terms of popularity, Puchong mayyy not be the most happening place in the Klang Valley la. In fact, at the time of the attack, there were only 20 people in Movida watching the EURO match. (We’re not suggesting anything, but there really are wayyy bigger clubs out there.)

Now it may seem like we’re making fun of Puchong but we’re not. We’re actually saying this to point out that if ISIS really was involved, it doesn’t seem to fit their modus operandi (the way they do things). According to the EU’s law enforcement agency, ISIS’ recent attacks have been going along the lines of go big or go home.

And by big we mean pretty darn horrible. This was done by a suicide car bomber in Iraq over the Ramadan period. Image from newsweek.com

“In selecting their targets IS has shown its capability to strike at will, at any time, and at almost any chosen target. In its target selection it shows a preference for soft targets with a potential to cause mass casualties.” – Changes in modus operandi of Islamic State terrorist attacks report, by Europol

Here are some attacks that ISIS has claimed credit for recently, their targets, how many people they killed in these attacks.

• Car bomb attack in Baghdad, Iraq (as shown in picture above).
• Target: Shia neighbourhood (ISIS identifies as Sunni Muslim).
• Death toll: nearly 300.
• Hostage situation in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
• Target: Possibly expats in the restaurant.
• Death toll: 20
• Shooting at a nightclub in Florida, USA.
• Target: LGBT community.
• Death toll: 49

It’s great that no one was killed in Puchong, but it isn’t like ISIS to target such a place, and what more when there was only such a small number of people present.



3. ISIS terrorists usually don’t do drive-by attacks

We’d like to clarify that what we mean is that if they intend to send a message, they’re attacks are a bit more…extravagant.

In the attacks we mentioned earlier that ISIS has claimed credit for, ALL of the terrorists pretty much went all out, with their guns a blazing, and ended up dead. In the Puchong attack? Someone threw the grenade into the crowd, which looks a lot more like a drive-by attack.

And you know who is always associated with drive-by shootings? That’s right, gangsters!

Actually ISIS does do drive-by attacks, but it seems like only when they have very specific targets in mind. For example:

• When they shot an outspoken Syrian newspaper editor.
• When they shot a Saudi Arabian Colonel.
• When they shot 15 policemen.

In Puchong however, there wasn’t even any guns involved. In fact, we couldn’t even pinpoint the last time ISIS claimed responsibility for a grenade drive-by attack. And aside from that, it’s also not very clear as to whowere they actually targeting.

It’s almost like they pakai hantam.



4. ISIS themselves said it wasn’t them!

When our IGP said that the attack was by ISIS, he also added that the 2 people involved had been arrested. And that they had received orders from a Malaysian in Syria.

“We found that these two men have received orders from one of the Malaysians in Syria, Muhammad Wanndy Mohamed Jedi (probably not the Star Wars one), who ordered them to launch attacks in Malaysia on senior leaders of the government, senior leaders of the Malaysian police, judges — because these three groups are those who block their activities.” – IGP Khalid Abu Bakar, as quoted by The Malay Mail Online

Muhammad Wanndy Mohamed Jedi, a popular Malaysian ISIS supporter in Syria pictured with his family. Image from Sydney Morning Herald

We’ll admit that from here on there are 2 differing stories. On one hand we have this Jedi guy saying that ISIS was the one who ordered the attack (on a Facebook account with the name Abu Hamzah Al-Fateh), and that more attacks were to follow soon. He had also previously appeared in a video on this account in March earlier this year.

However, on the other hand, there have also been reports that this Jedi fella was reported to have said ISIS WASN’T responsible on a Facebook account bearing his real name.

“This is a heavy accusation intended to make those arrested as scapegoats. They (police) are cooking up stories as revenge towards me and manipulating facts of the arrests to divert the people’s attention from Malaysia’s current issues which is getting worse.” – Muhammad Wanndy Mohamed Jedi on his Facebook page, as quoted by Astro Awani

The Jedi also added that those that the police arrested were supporters BUT did not receive any instructions of any sort from him and that they didn’t do it! So in other words…

And he said that if Malaysia were to punish these 2 that we arrested, for a crime that they didn’t commit, they would take revenge big time.

Sadly we were unable to verify which side is more real because both Facebook accounts seem to have been suspended. Still, this doesn’t take away the possibility that ISIS may not actually be claiming responsibility for this attack when they’ve claimed responsibility for so many others.

So is the ISIS threat real in Malaysia?

With everything ISIS-related that is going on in the world, AND with the news that there was a video of somealleged ISIS flers declaring war on Malaysia, it’s hard to say that ISIS isn’t an issue to Malaysia AT ALL.

At the same time, with all the things that we’ve mentioned, it’s POSSIBLE that it may not be ISIS who was responsible for the grenade attack. But if that’s the case, why has our IGP already concluded that it is ISIS?

Well, there could be another reason la, something that gives our PM some pretty scary superpowers.

Click to read what these superpowers are.

Some of you may have heard of the National Security Council (NSC) Bill. We talked about it in a previous articlebut in short it gives our PM a heck of a lot of powers like the ability to declare emergency in any area any time he wants. When this bill was first passed, PM Najib actually said that it would help prevent terrorist attacks.

Not everyone saw it the same way though. People like Lawyers for Liberty and Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasancriticised the bill saying that we already have existing laws that are able to deal with terrorist threats, and thatour PM was using terrorism as an excuse to execute the NSC bill.

“There is simply little correlation between any terrorist activities and the powers conferred in the NSC Bill that seeks to concentrate extraordinary powers within the hands the prime minister and the NSC.” – Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan, as quoted by The Malay Mail Online

And with that in mind, it does seem a little suspicious that despite how strange the Puchong “ISIS” attack looked, our IGP has already confidently said that it was the work of ISIS just a month after the NSC bill was confirmed to be a law of Malaysia.

• 5 SCARY SUPER POWERS THAT THIS NEWLY PASSED LAW GIVES NAJIB
• DID ISIS RECRUIT THESE TERRORISTS FROM A MALAYSIAN UNIVERSITY?
• HOW SCARED SHOULD MALAYSIANS BE OF ISIS? WE EXPLORE 5 FEARS.

source: http://cilisos.my/4-really-weird-things-about-the-terrorist-bomb-attack-in-puchong/