by Nathaniel Tan(07-21-12)@
http://www.malaysiakini.com
Water, water, every where,
And all the boards did shrink;
Water, water, every where,
Nor any drop to drink.
- Samuel Taylor Coleridge, The Rime of the Ancient Mariner
COMMENT: Have
you ever been made to buy something you didn’t need? Or worse, have you
been deceived, intimidated and bullied into making an entirely
unnecessary, overpriced purchase?
It would appear that this is what we are
facing with Syabas, this “water crisis” it keeps getting excited about.
However, if we examine the hard facts closely, we will see that the only
crisis we are facing is an all too familiar crisis of corruption and
cronyism – centred tightly around the RM8.65 billion Langat 2 Water
Treatment Plant.
Do we really need the Langat 2 plant?
We all know politicians use
taxpayer-funded mega projects to make money. The bigger the mega
project, the bigger the kickbacks – and RM8.65 billion is plenty big.
With that much money at stake, the last
thing ‘well-connected’ individuals care about is whether the project is
actually needed, or whether it truly benefits the rakyat or not.
The
Selangor government is all for preventing this RM8.65 billion gravy
train from riding out, and its position is simple: there is plenty of
water in Selangor, and if there is any shortage at all, it is due to
failure, or worse, failure on the part of Syabas.
Here’s what Syabas doesn’t want you to
know about this water “crisis”: it’s not about how much raw water there
is (since the dams in Selangor are all clearly full); it’s about how
Syabas is failing dramatically to efficiently convert enough of that raw
water into potable water.
(Technically
speaking, the main company responsible for treatment of water is Puncak
Niaga Bhd, which in turn owns 70 percent of Syabas. Both companies are
in essence run by the same people. For the purpose of this article,
‘Syabas’ refers to both Puncak Niaga and Syabas.)
Not all the raw water that goes into a
water treatment plant becomes potable water – that is, water deemed fit
to run in our taps at home. The technical term for the amount of raw
water that is wasted due to inefficiencies in the water treatment plant
is called “non-revenue water” or NRW.
32pct of water produced by Syabas is wasted
Syabas’ level of NRW is 32 percent. This
means that a whopping one-third of the raw water that enters a Syabas
water treatment plant goes entirely to waste.
Syabas
must be congratulated here, for succeeding in wasting more water than
Dhaka, Bangladesh, where the NRW is only 29 percent. Eastern Manila
managed to bring down its NRW from 63 percent in 1997 to 11 percent in
2010.
More
developed nations have even lower levels of NRW – Germany’s NRW is only
seven percent, while the Netherlands and Denmark have achieved NRW
levels of six percent.
Perhaps
this can be attributed to the fact that they are advanced, developed
Western democracies? Oh, wait a minute, Singapore’s NRW is five percent.
It looks like under Syabas’
brilliant management, we have managed to waste six times more water than
our neighbour to the south whom we like so much to make fun of. Thank
you, Syabas!
There is also talk that Syabas is not
given enough money to improve its services. However, the question is,
would you give more money to a company that demonstrates zero ability to
put that money to good use, and in fact has wasted away all the money
that has already been given to it?
Quite simply put, all we need to do to
ensure a sufficient water supply for the Klang Valley is to drastically
reduce the amount of NRW. For that, we don’t need a RM8.65 billion water
treatment plant, or to throw money at the problem – we just need
cleaner, better managers.
Is Syabas turning off the taps?
It’s little wonder that Syabas has never
had much incentive to improve its efficiency or quality of its service –
for it does not have any competition. This simple fact has rendered
many an industry in Malaysia completely defunct. Automobiles, airlines,
telecommunications and power generation are all industries where cronies
get rich, and Malaysians pay high prices for crap quality.
A
monopoly like Syabas is able to take this game one step further. When
you have complete monopoly over the water industry, you don’t have to
wait for an actual water crisis to justify an RM8.65 billion white
elephant mega project. Even in the midst of heavy rain every single day,
all you need to do is turn off the taps, and voila – “water crisis”.
I think we’ve all noticed the increased
frequency of water cuts in the Klang Valley recently. A simple question
remains: are the taps turned off because of a water shortage? Or because
some people want you to think there’s a water shortage?
Is this all to justify a RM8.65 billion
water treatment plant that no one needs – a plant that might make a few
lucky people extremely rich, while impoverishing the rest of the nation?
Is Syabas threatening us?
One of the ‘best’ quotes I have read
throughout this saga comes from Syabas Technical Services Executive
Director V Subramaniam, perhaps a minor pawn sent forth to spew such
brilliant statements as:
“The water crisis at present is the
result of a shortfall in treated water for distribution caused by the
refusal of the state government to issue the development order for
construction of the Langat 2 treatment plant.”
Does Syabas take us for dummies?
According to this logic, if the Selangor
government approves the construction of Langat 2 today (a project that
will take years to complete), then the water crisis will disappear
tomorrow.
Sounds a little suspicious? Perhaps
Subramaniam’s statement is technically correct, in that the state
government’s refusal has indeed precipitated a ‘water shortage’ – except
that he is silent on whether the said water shortage is natural – or
manufactured by unscrupulous people to achieve even more unscrupulous
ends.
Who is politicising the water problem?
There should be a law against this sort of thing. Oh, wait. There is
this thing called the Water Services Industry Act (WSIA), which was
passed by the BN-dominated Parliament in 2006.
This law provided for the
de-privatisation of the water industry and its return to the respective
state governments, for privatisation had clearly proven to be a
disastrous failure across the board.
The water industries of BN-led (for now)
Malacca and Johor were successfully deprivatised following the gazetting
of the WSIA. But what happened to Selangor post-2008?
Both sides like to accuse each other of
‘politicising’ the water problem, but when the facts show that the
federal government had allowed deprivatisation in BN-held states while
preventing it in Selangor, the truth becomes clear to all.
Let’s not forget that Syabas is run by
Rozali Ismail, the ready-to-run-for-Parliament Selangor UMNO treasurer
who, despite creating a spectacular failure of Syabas and being accused
of using millions of Syabas’ funds to buy pipes from his own company in
Indonesia, is still paid a salary of RM425,000 a month as CEO.
The Selangor government has openly stated
that it plans to slash the monthly salary for this post by 90 percent.
While Syabas is dead set on exponential increases of up to 75 percent on
water tariffs, Selangor has pledged to cap any tariff increases to 12
percent. So, who is looking out for the rakyat, and who is looking out
for themselves?
BN plundering before an inevitable defeat?
Menteri
Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim is the man most keen on the de-privatisation
of the Selangor water industry and the takeover of Syabas by the state
government.
This is the man who increased the cash
reserves of the Selangor government five-fold from RM400 million in 2008
to RM2.1 billion in 2012.
Under UMNO and Najib Abdul Razak, the
federal debt – a debt our children and grandchildren will have to pay –
has since the year 2007 nearly doubled to RM421 billion this year.
Who do you think is better suited to run
our water industry? Are we going to allow people who are bringing the
nation to the edge of a real – not manufactured – economic crisis to
bully us into footing the bill for a RM8.65 billion megaproject that
nobody needs?
Are these high jinks the latest attempt –
along with FGV, George Kent and the innumerable new spending
initiatives the Prime Minister has recently announced – to bleed the
nation’s coffers completely dry for personal gain before finishing a
full term in office in 2013?
It seems the BN has serious fears of
losing power, and is trying to take out as much as it can before having
to face an angry electorate next year. If the BN was confident of a
victory, surely the general election would have been held by now.In any
case, the unscrupulous among us are welcome to play their games.
Turning
off the taps and replacing the flow of water with the flow of painfully
illogical arguments is less likely to pressure the state government to
forsake the interests of the rakyat, and more likely to point the finger
back at those truly responsible for scaremongering and criminal
mismanagement.
